Forum

> > Off Topic > Battlefront vs Black ops 3
Forums overviewOff Topic overviewLog in to reply

English Battlefront vs Black ops 3

11 replies
To the start Previous 1 Next To the start

old Battlefront vs Black ops 3

Greenhawk
User Off Offline

Quote
So lately there's been speculation over the two games. One being major server based problems on Blacks Ops 3, to the lack of content on Star Wars Battlefront. This topic was created to see what game do you favor and why or to just talk about the 2 games in general. I'll start:

I for one think battlefront is better than Black ops for a few reasons.
• Outstanding Graphics
• Great Multiplayer
• Amazing level design
• Amazing sound effects
• Character Customization.

However the lack of a single player campaign threw me off a little bit, but that doesn't bother me as much. I still do, however hope they make a campaign in the DLC (If they don't, then oh well, I guess ). Also the content is somewhat scarce but I've acquired the season pass, hoping that they're just playing with us and a lot of cool new stuff is on the way. It get's repetitive at times but the game is still highly addicting to me, for some reason. I hope that they add new Jedis/Siths and other heroes

Black ops....well what can I say. it's pretty much the same. Good campaign. same ol' multiplayer and great zombies (so I've heard). Their specialist system reminded me of Team Fortress, with their different special weapons, so I thought that was pretty cool!

I have the season pass for both and I'm waiting to see what both games have up their sleeves. But despite everything, They're both good but I prefer Star Wars Battlefront.

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

VADemon
User Off Offline

Quote
Neither of those. They milk this genre and particular gameplay for years now (compare Bf3, Bf4 and now Star Wars Battlefront (number 3)). I don't want to suport this kind of games.
Although I really enjoyed Battlefront 2 and the new Battlefront indeed gives this kind of gameplay once again (yea, admitted, it has new gameplay elements, but still). So if I had to decide between both then it would be Battlefront. But the microtransactions, EA's DLC policy and last but not least Origin-only-ness stopped me from buying it straight away and I doubt I will do in the near future.

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

Raisun
User Off Offline

Quote
I prefer the old Battlefront, people still play it. And there is mod support, which new one lacks. Also, as you mentioned, it has no singleplayer, but oh well, Battlefront was about multiplayer mainly.

Black Ops 3 is meh, it looks like game companies took Titanfall "awesome" mechanics and gameplay and now want to milk it dry. Sure, specialist system should bring some diversity in gameplay, but I'd say it's nothing that special or new.

I'd stick with old Battlefront. Damn, I might even find my old CD with it and play it again.

edit: Btw user VADemon, your pink theme project is great, I don't plan on using any other than yours for now. Not even going back for green.
edited 1×, last 07.12.15 10:12:35 pm

old TLDR, It's terrible!

CY
Reviewer Off Offline

Quote
Battlefront EA isnt worth 60$ or the overpriced 110$ season pass. You get 10/10 about graphics and sound designs but not the game content. Mark my word, the old Battlefront series still have more contents and fun than final build of Battlefront EA.

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

Greenhawk
User Off Offline

Quote
Battlefront 1: "Why can't I play as a Jedi?!"
Battlefront 2: *Get's more than requested! cries tears of joy*

Of course though! Nothing can replace Battlefront 2, unless EA pulls off the world's greatest DLC miracle next year. I played Battlefront 2 the other day on my xbox too and I've never once played the multiplayer (except maybe one time, along time ago). But anyways, that's another reason why I'm sticking with battlefront. They may have more things to show us and of the legacy left by Pandemic Studios. They even said they lacked the depth to appeal to kids, which to me is beyond a bs excuse to give, but you can tell dice was doing well. it's EA that's screwing us. they even said they may have a campaign later in the year and for all it's worth, it better be free.

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

ohaz
User Off Offline

Quote
user Greenhawk has written
I for one think battlefront is better than Black ops for a few reasons.
• Great Multiplayer
The multiplayer in BF is fun for about 3 hours. After that it's repetitive and boring. The only two good things about SWBF are graphics and sound, everything else is pure shit. Sorry.

Can't say anything about BO3. The last CoD I've played was CoD 2.

Quote
they even said they may have a campaign later in the year and for all it's worth, it better be free.
Nope it won't, it's EA.

Quote
I prefer the old Battlefront, people still play it. And there is mod support, which new one lacks. Also, as you mentioned, it has no singleplayer, but oh well, Battlefront was about multiplayer mainly.
It also has a ton of maps, 64 player MP, space battles, tons of vehicles, the prequel era.

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

Black Wolf
User Off Offline

Quote
Black ops 3 is shittiest game i have ever seen, just few new things and lets publish new game, get a lot of money from retarded kids. As many people say: Game where snipers run and light machine gun users camp.

Battlefront was bad aswell, they just made it look like cod with futuristic weapons etc. Missions and everything else is bad

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

_Yank
User Off Offline

Quote
@user Black Wolf: Battlefront isnt bad it is just disappointing. The gameplay and the weapons are much different from COD though..

You should have a look at Rainbow Six Siege
edited 1×, last 09.12.15 05:59:23 pm

old Re: Battlefront vs Black ops 3

0a
User Off Offline

Quote
I'll take a wild guess and assume more than half of people who commented on these games don't even own/played these titles.
To the start Previous 1 Next To the start
Log in to replyOff Topic overviewForums overview