Should we remove crappy edits of default resources
Offline
Forum
Off Topic Should we remove crappy edits of default resources
Umfrage
Should we remove crappy edits of default resources?
Nur registrierte Benutzer können abstimmen
| Yes! We want quality on this site! | 29,41% (15) | |
| I'm indifferent about the issue. | 21,57% (11) | |
| Nope, I like looking at eyecancer inducing crap. | 49,02% (25) |
51 Stimmen abgegeben
A file deletion request system is what we need, for example, as soon as a certain amount of users 'reported' a file for not being worth keeping in the archive, it gets removed. Not without a moderator's allowance obviously..
1× editiert, zuletzt 16.06.11 20:35:41
Majatek hat geschriebenWe need a file archive purge.
Soonish I think.
*edit*
I've got an idea! Files that are rated lower than 3/5 stars have 3 days before it gets automatically deleted.
A moderator is in charge of what to save, as the system will notify the moderator (and the user who uploaded the file to give him a fighting chance to make it better) of the file that is selected for deletion.
If it's been downrated (from revenge rating or something), that moderator can freeze it's deletion time to prevent the submission from being deleted.
If however the work is truly crappy, the moderator can ignore it, and instead the system will automatically delete it after 3 days because the moderator ignores it.
Soonish I think.
*edit*
I've got an idea! Files that are rated lower than 3/5 stars have 3 days before it gets automatically deleted.
A moderator is in charge of what to save, as the system will notify the moderator (and the user who uploaded the file to give him a fighting chance to make it better) of the file that is selected for deletion.
If it's been downrated (from revenge rating or something), that moderator can freeze it's deletion time to prevent the submission from being deleted.
If however the work is truly crappy, the moderator can ignore it, and instead the system will automatically delete it after 3 days because the moderator ignores it.
which makes the moderator's work even harder --'
Until a file is rated, it stays at the top of the recently uploaded/edited/commented on list, then, when someone rates it, it drops to a stack below the most recently rated from highest to lowest (lowest rated files get pushed back several pages, and further if necessary)
A file that is already rated, but recently commented on will also show up at the top.
That way, old files that are crap will sink to the bottom of the pile and be forgotten, whereas the better submissions stay up top, near the recently uploaded where they deserve to be.
Majatek hat geschriebenActually, I got a better idea:
Until a file is rated, it stays at the top of the recently uploaded/edited/commented on list, then, when someone rates it, it drops to a stack below the most recently rated from highest to lowest (lowest rated files get pushed back several pages, and further if necessary)
A file that is already rated, but recently commented on will also show up at the top.
That way, old files that are crap will sink to the bottom of the pile and be forgotten, whereas the better submissions stay up top, near the recently uploaded where they deserve to be.
Until a file is rated, it stays at the top of the recently uploaded/edited/commented on list, then, when someone rates it, it drops to a stack below the most recently rated from highest to lowest (lowest rated files get pushed back several pages, and further if necessary)
A file that is already rated, but recently commented on will also show up at the top.
That way, old files that are crap will sink to the bottom of the pile and be forgotten, whereas the better submissions stay up top, near the recently uploaded where they deserve to be.
Or you could just change the ascendance of the files so you see highest rated one first.
PeterToman hat geschriebenHeard about "revenge-rates"? DC could have delete all the revenge rated files.
If a user of submission feels that someone "revenge rated" on his work, then he can notify a moderator.
Majatek hat geschriebenYeah, but then I miss out on seeing the most recently submitted.
Then switch back --'
That hard to click?
http://unrealsoftware.de/files_show.php?file=3938
Aythadis hat geschriebenThere are defiantly some files I think should be removed... like this one, it's a piece of sh*t. LITERALLY!
http://unrealsoftware.de/files_show.php?file=3938
http://unrealsoftware.de/files_show.php?file=3938
Poop flash bang is awesome. It should stay.
How many stars do you want the displayed files to have?
☻ *****
☻ ****
☻ ***
☻ **
☻ *
------
Pretty weird that no one had this idea before.
I'm indifferent about the issue. (aka I don't give a fuck.)
medeiros hat geschrieben I'm indifferent about the issue. (aka I don't give a fuck.)
medeiros hat geschrieben I'm indifferent about the issue. (aka I don't give a fuck.)
EDIT: macymagiska112, please remove your signature images. My anti-virus blocks them for having attached spyware on them.
1× editiert, zuletzt 26.06.11 21:59:31
DoP3 hat geschriebenHow about a few upload moderators ...
Hey, how about moderators that fucking search for you.
Yates hat geschrieben DoP3 hat geschriebenHow about a few upload moderators ...
Hey, how about moderators that fucking search for you.
xD.
Nope. Let's say. We are searching for the moderators.
Nah. Im to lazy to search. Aythadis hat geschriebenEDIT: macymagiska112, please remove your signature images. My anti-virus blocks them for having attached spyware on them.
My firewall blocks your signature.
@topic
I shall remain indifferent.