Forum

> > Off Topic > Should we remove crappy edits of default resources
ForenübersichtOff Topic-ÜbersichtEinloggen, um zu antworten

Englisch Should we remove crappy edits of default resources

43 Antworten
Seite
Zum Anfang Vorherige 1 2 3 Nächste Zum Anfang

Umfrage Umfrage

Should we remove crappy edits of default resources?

Nur registrierte Benutzer können abstimmen
Yes! We want quality on this site!
29,41% (15)
I'm indifferent about the issue.
21,57% (11)
Nope, I like looking at eyecancer inducing crap.
49,02% (25)
51 Stimmen abgegeben

alt Re: Should we remove crappy edits of default resources

Mechanolith
User Off Offline

Zitieren
user Krimhorn hat geschrieben
I don't know, but does it has any sense? People anyway (at least Newbies) will upload their "ARTS".


If this is inserted on the rules, they can be freely banned:
Rules hat geschrieben
Rules
[...]
IMG:https://www.unrealsoftware.de/img/i_warning.png
Ban
You will get a ban when you violate the rules. A banned account is very limited. It is not allowed to get a new account. Every person is only allowed to have one single account.
[...]


I honestly love this idea, because it's so annoying to see people uploading those damn craps and flooding the File Archive.

alt Re: Should we remove crappy edits of default resources

Majatek
User Off Offline

Zitieren
You make a good point Lee.

Just take heed though that for each new upload, if it's an edit, I will refuse to rate higher than 3 stars, and if it's like the "work" shown above, I will bomb it with a 1/5.

I prefer quality over quantity, thanks.
You could lock this thread now if you want to.

alt Re: Should we remove crappy edits of default resources

Majatek
User Off Offline

Zitieren
Looking at those edits actually made me feel like I vomited in my mouth. I mean, I woke up, drank some juice, looked at the submissions, and then felt as if that juice backed up and flowed up back into my mouth from my stomach.

Eugh.

I think we, as a community, need to start creating tutorials on how to not suck at skinning/spriting.
*sadface*

*edit*
Lol @ the person who voted for "I LIEK LUKING AT EYECANCER!1!one"
Yates, is that you?

alt Nope.

macymagiska112
User Off Offline

Zitieren
Nope. Cause this is like banning people that has a ugly avatar. So no.

alt Re: Should we remove crappy edits of default resources

Majatek
User Off Offline

Zitieren
We need a file archive purge.
Soonish I think.

*edit*

I've got an idea! Files that are rated lower than 3/5 stars have 3 days before it gets automatically deleted.
A moderator is in charge of what to save, as the system will notify the moderator (and the user who uploaded the file to give him a fighting chance to make it better) of the file that is selected for deletion.
If it's been downrated (from revenge rating or something), that moderator can freeze it's deletion time to prevent the submission from being deleted.
If however the work is truly crappy, the moderator can ignore it, and instead the system will automatically delete it after 3 days because the moderator ignores it.
2× editiert, zuletzt 16.06.11 20:16:04
Zum Anfang Vorherige 1 2 3 Nächste Zum Anfang
Einloggen, um zu antwortenOff Topic-ÜbersichtForenübersicht