Offline
Note: I do not recommend playing with 3D enabled, as there are many bugs that I could not fix
1:1 mapexport:
Approved by Yates
Download
359 kb, 681 Downloads
Files
CS2D Maps Guitorres - de_island
Guitorres - de_island
22 comments
8 like it!359 kb, 681 Downloads
Note: I do not recommend playing with 3D enabled, as there are many bugs that I could not fix 1:1 mapexport:
Comments
22 comments
1 
Log in!
You need to log in to be able to write comments!Log in
I like it!
I like it!
I like it!
edited 1×, last 05.09.17 06:12:12 am
I like it!
I like it!
Masea: That's what the whole option is for with the Z height. It fixes the "floating" feel so you can position it as if it were laying ontop of something else.@
Mora: Never. I bet this is just poor map editing. Yates: and still, not all things in 3d may work good for all tiles.. I'm sure you'd have alot of shit troubles while developing a map using 3d walls.http://imgur.com/a/gu8cw
I like it!
Yates: The only problem is not that what you said. No matter whether you can type lower than 32 or not. It will look bad yet again. Sprites and such look bad in the 3D just because we feel like they're flying. Unless what all you gonna make just square sprites. I support your opinion that you said all the maps should work with the 3D. Yet, it is... I don't know - hard to make it work. Masea: Perfectly fine as in no breaking issues. I should surely expect you of all people to not take everything literally. Apparently not. Yates has writtenI've used the new editor far more than you have when you decided to create this map. The only thing I came across is env_sprite not being able to set the Z height lower than 32. I reported that issue. It will be fixed. Maybe you should be doing the same instead of "no work is buggd pls how 2 sav map."
This means it doesn't work "perfectly fine" mate. It is annoying really.
I've used the new editor far more than you have when you decided to create this map. The only thing I came across is env_sprite not being able to set the Z height lower than 32. I reported that issue. It will be fixed. Maybe you should be doing the same instead of "no work is buggd pls how 2 sav map."
Yates: Quote
it works perfectly fine
sorry, but nope... there is several bugs with shadows & lights with the 3d toll on, like a fucking tile with 0x0 3d scale, but in game that sht have 32x32 3d scale, just make no sense, or decails fuses with walls, lal
Mora: Oh sorry let me just update a 4 year old map that isn't used any more. I didn't think I'd have to elaborate but oh my you just had to lower the bar for everyone. Great job.All new maps should support the feature. There is no reason not to - it works perfectly fine. Just because no one tries doesn't mean it's broken.
Yates: due to sickness of this 3D no any map should be launched with this feature. I'd have a look on your rpg map with 3D. Especially houses and windows.
I like it!
+Landings with shadows? It's kinda wrong to me.
Awesome gfx.
Now to problems:
for 5v5 is too small.
Although TTs have some good timing, CTs can scan(make random shots). For example at left, they can shoot that easily and making it impossible to trasspass such long bridge.
MID is very easy to cover as CT, and by covering mid you can cover right too= overpowered. This is because the map is small.
If you play offensive right it's easy to have frozen TTs, which cant even move.
So to me it looks like, if you dont rush very fast then it's a very boring map.
It's also hard to differenciate which is wall from obstacle at plain sight.
And that box on the middle should be deleted and make a little tunnel over it, so you can go to the bridge and TTs can rotate faster.
I would never play it on 5on5, but 4v4 is possible
I like it!
oxytamine: wont agree@
BlackBelt: the map is fcking good! It's orgasm for my eyes.
I like it!
I like it!