1 
Offline
And now with the armor, you get a score that is 350-0.
Is the score from before better? or is the newer one better?
Forum
CS2D General Is the score better?
Is the score better?
20 replies
Poll
Is the score better?
Only registered users are allowed to vote
| Yes. | 10.71% (3) | |
| No. | 89.29% (25) |
28 votes cast
And now with the armor, you get a score that is 350-0.
Is the score from before better? or is the newer one better?
"And now with the armor, you get a score that is 350-0."
are you talking about player score?
anybody explain please.
The armor reduces 50% from the damage you get which means that in order to equal the first 325-0 score (with no armor) you need a score of 650-0 (with armor).
SO: 325-0 (without A) = 650-0 (with A )
[325 : 0 (no armor penalty)] : [350 : 2 (50% armor penalty)] = 325 : 175 = 1.85
The first score is 1.85 times better than the second one.EDIT: Who voted 'Yes' ? I want to give him some math lessons.
CJ7 has written
How do you get such scores anyway? Camping it all out?
350 kills, that's possible. If you play for approx. 30 minutes (TDM) - 1 hour (ST) in a server you get that. Now 0 deaths... kinda impossible. Only if you play with the biggest noobs in the whole Universe with no hacks that never leave the server after you kill them (may be bots too, super easy dumb ones).
But if you're an Admin and want to show off...
setscore...is there for you.
A player named Dolphin Power claims to have the best Constuction score record with 357-0. HOWEVER, this was done in the newest version, whilst the record before was in the old version. My question is, with the 50% Armor that we now can get, is the previous score (lets say 325-0) still better than the 357-0? Would the 357-0 score count as the record? Discuss...
so it's probably even harder now.
DC has written
well.. there are rpgs now... one rpg hit and you are dead even with the 50% armor...
so it's probably even harder now.
so it's probably even harder now.
but this is just with armor, no RPG Launchers. Would the first one be better, or would the second one?
especially because 1-hit kills are not possible when you are wearing a 50% armor.
well actualy when you think hacks arent cheats cuz you got enought brain to downlod and instal and use it was made by you and score is by you too. You had brain that is all. It is hard to xplain but just think about it
DC has written
That is exactly my point!You have to find a way to balance the new RPG with the rest of the weapons.I suggest you add a server option that enables/disables super supplys.Or you can just remove the armor. 1-hit kills are not possible when you are wearing a 50% armor.
Quote
The armor reduces 50% from the damage you get which means that in order to equal the first 325-0 score (with no armor) you need a score of 650-0 (with armor).
Except that it reduces 50% from the damage your opponents get too, neutralizing the supposed advantage that your math is based on. That's why this whole idea is silly. Armor is not an advantage and it doesn't make an old score worth more than a new score, yes the person making the new score gets armor, but he also has to kill armor-wearing opponents. Get it?
stanmarsh has written
Except that it reduces 50% from the damage your opponents get too, neutralizing the supposed advantage that your math is based on. That's why this whole idea is silly. Armor is not an advantage and it doesn't make an old score worth more than a new score, yes the person making the new score gets armor, but he also has to kill armor-wearing opponents. Get it?
Quote
The armor reduces 50% from the damage you get which means that in order to equal the first 325-0 score (with no armor) you need a score of 650-0 (with armor).
Except that it reduces 50% from the damage your opponents get too, neutralizing the supposed advantage that your math is based on. That's why this whole idea is silly. Armor is not an advantage and it doesn't make an old score worth more than a new score, yes the person making the new score gets armor, but he also has to kill armor-wearing opponents. Get it?
Write it in a history book.
But, 325 kills with no armor is better.
Quote
Write it in a history book.
I wrote it in this thread where it belongs.
Quote
325 kills with no armor is better.
Incorrect, I explained why already.
stanmarsh has written
I wrote it in this thread where it belongs.
Incorrect, I explained why already.
Quote
Write it in a history book.
I wrote it in this thread where it belongs.
Quote
325 kills with no armor is better.
Incorrect, I explained why already.
no, you state it as fact. So if you think it's so right then write it in a history book.